I am an Assistant Professor at Clemson University. I received my PhD in Government (comparative politics and methodology) from the University of Texas at Austin in 2016.
My research uses democratic theory and social psychology to suggest solutions to difficult puzzles in political behavior. My research topics include political system attitudes (especially regime support), populism, and the interaction of political economy and culture. I use both qualitative and cutting-edge quantitative methods to test these solutions. My regional focus is on Latin America, though I also study the United States and Europe.
Dr. Matthew Rhodes-Purdy
Regime Support Beyond the Balance Sheet. Cambridge University Press.
This book resolves one of Latin America's most difficult public opinion puzzles: the discrepancy between policy performance and regime support in Chile and Venezuela. Using insights drawn from democratic theory and social psychology, it shows that participation inflated support in Venezuela, while the absence of participatory opportunities have contributed to democratic malaise in Chile.
"This book offers a bold challenge to conventional thinking about what democracies need to do to generate and maintain public support... At a time when citizen disenchantment with even well-established democracies seems to be on the rise, Rhodes-Purdy provides a provocative and compelling case for why participation matters." Kenneth Roberts, Cornell University
MY LATEST RESEARCH
Current Research Projects
Populism has returned to the developed world with a vengeance. This project studies how economic and cultural anxieties interact to generate the anti-system attitudes on which populism depends and the institutional weakness which enables its rise.
The Perils of Personalism
Presidents in Latin America have have frequently gained enormous power, escaping the bonds of institutional checks and balances. This project analyzes the influence of this dynamic on democratic health, and the neglected role of political parties in restraining presidential ambitions.
We measure personalism using an expert survey, conducted with sixty-four experts in Latin American politics. Personalism indicators will be available here as soon as the article is accepted for publication.
"The Engagement Curve." Latin American Research Review. With Rafael Piñeiro and Fernando Rosenblatt.
Considerable research has been conducted on the relationship between socioeconomic inequality and political engagement. This article argues that populist leaders, who tend to explicitly connect political and socioeconomic exclusion, can activate latent grievances around inequality.